E1. Thesis

SPC Concept and its SPC Drivers stamps (support) the philosophy of the Great Triad (GT); acceptance of the synergy of the Earth, Nature, and the Human in a shared environment. SPC Drivers are still developing, and the Open Webbook presents its last version, which distinguishes primary and derived drivers. It gives rise to some considerations and topics that do not yet need to be sorted and arranged into coherent wholes, and it is better to work with them on a general level as they come.

Any observer (a live individual creature) can see themself and his/her surroundings in the As-Is time and reacts to stimuli with a link to the To-Be time. It is the ongoing work of scholars and social groups both before and after the time of ancient philosophy (e.g., Figure C1a.1).

We can give many examples. Thus, e.g., classical science is gaining new impulses, e.g., via quantum mechanics. The Human can understand more and more where he/she is. However, other science disciplines like sociology and its branch segment - the economy did not link the Human experiences pragmatically enough. It is a pity. Because generally, we need two views on our history; a historical (who was what, what he/she said) and a pragmatical (how to "spice" the everyday corrosion via positive, not war activities. An example of positive movement for the 21. century is bound to the current vision of AI, e.g., with GDT and GH. Both trends seem needed and can bring new impulses for a common consensus on being worldwide. 

The second view (pragmatism) is about transfers (about understanding and testing gained findings in the history of the Human in the GT for at least 3000 years (according to the written memory). The pragmatism, mostly mathematical, rational) is lagging. The current (global) population is not ready to absorb the new technology offers. It is inefficient and needs to prepare and implement projects of scaling the best practices of our everyday being till the last "minute" (for the correct As-Is timing principle). For example, to look where the Human is, what he/she needs for his/her future, and if a common core of the best approach for our future life exists (for the correct To-Be timing planning).

For example, for motivation, decision-making, social balancing, etc. This comment is a challenge for a deeper view of the "computerization" of the Human role in the GT and has support in Chapter C, e.g., Figures C7b. The commentary on the role of films (audio, video) in the book Infrastructure & SPC Concept, pages 307-310 (see G10 on the web bar G-Genesis) is also worth mentioning. Probably, these notes can assist answer to the question of why the distributed mechanism has not gained till now good impulses to grow into a new quality.

For example, the discussions about the need for a Unified Economy confirm it. This interest provoked the demand for digital transformations almost in all sectors worldwide. Nevertheless, the present vision of AI development (e.g., activities of the Open AI) doesn't see it. Chapter C is a small contribution to this serious problem, e.g., via Figure C10e.2.

Another example is Maslow's hierarchy of needs, a theory of motivation that states that five categories of human needs dictate an individual's behavior. Especially for the Human as a partner of the GT, it is a type of scaling of progress in understanding themselves. It is a case of a theoretical approach. On the side of actual (fundamental) social groupings, one cannot fail to mention the positive Spin of Man's behavior during the Renaissance and Humanism in Europe in the 14th and 15th centuries. Understanding what Spin is saying opens the door to understanding what pragmatism means for our future.