Figure C5d.1b Products (goods) spectrum of both global and local markets
Private goods
Private goods are consumed individually and cannot be obtained by the user without the supplier's permission, which they usually receive through payment.
Private goods mean in economics as "an item that yields positive benefits to people" that is excludable (i.e., its owners can exercise private property rights).
Preventing those who have not paid for it from using the good or consuming its benefits); rivalrous (i.e., consumption by one necessarily prevents another).
Common-pool goods
Common-pool goods are consumed individually, and it is virtually impossible to prevent anyone from taking them freely.
Common-pool goods are typically regulated and nurtured to prevent demand from overwhelming supply and allow for continued exploitation. Common-pool resources include forests, artificial irrigation systems, fishing grounds, and groundwater basins.
Tool goods
Tool goods are used jointly, but the user must pay, and those who won't pay can easily be excluded from enjoying the use of the goods. The more difficult or costly it is to exclude a customer from using a tool well, the more like a collective good it is.
When the feasibility of exclusion is relatively easy (as with a private interest), benefit consumption is joint rather than subtractive.
The output is known as a toll good or service. Parks and game reserves are examples of toll goods or services. This way, toll goods, and services are like private goods and services.
Entrepreneurs are incentivized to invest in these products, and they do not necessarily require collective action (even though governments often create and run parks).
Collective goods
Collective goods are used jointly, and it is impossible to exclude anyone from their use, so people generally will not pay for them without correction.
What is achieved by citizenship, collective action, and active participation in politics and public service?
The concept of the common good differs significantly among philosophical, economic, political, and scientific doctrines. In philosophy, economics, and political science, the common goods (commonwealth, general welfare, or public benefit) refer to what is shared and beneficial for all or most members of a given community.
Come back to Aristotle: collective goods or services are suitable for the individual but attainable only by the community. Therefore, they are shared by community members.
Figure C5d.1b illustrates the concept by displaying additional goods and services in varying exclusion and collaborative consumption degrees.
Subjective judgment is involved in the price placement of services in this diagram presented by E. S. Savas book "Privatization-The Key to Better Government," Chatham House Publisher, Inc. 1987, New Jersey introduced two exciting approaches. His approach demonstrates four corners of the graph correspond to pure forms:
1. Pure individually consumed goods for which exclusion is entirely feasible.
2. Pure jointly consumed goods for which exclusion is entirely feasible.
3. Pure individually consumed goods for which exclusion is completely infeasible; and
4. Pure jointly consumed goods for which exclusion is entirely infeasible.
These four idealized goods and services are essential enough and will be referred to often enough to justify naming them; it demonstrates the diagram. The author calls them: 1. Private goods; 2. Toll goods; 3. Common pool goods; and 4. Collective goods.
It is an example of the significant impact on the character (type) of the organization and related projects, on their behavior (processes), sustainability (competitiveness), carbon footprint (price subsidies), etc.
The example describes a specific environment where "projects and organizations" collide in their inputs into digital transformation.
It is a transparent approach to understanding and grasping the necessary scaling in sufficient generality. Gaining the required value of the obtained data to understand human life paths in the Ecosystem of which we are part.
We encounter various interpretations of what an ecosystem is. When we borrow a simple general definition from Wikipedia, we can get an answer. "An ecosystem is a geographic area where plants, animals, and other organisms, as well as weather and landscape, work together to form a bubble of life."
Ecosystems are a wide area for scaling. It contains biotic or living parts and abiotic factors or nonliving parts. These biotic factors are included in plants, animals, and other organisms. We can see that we can find almost all information in this definition in the highest concentration and grasping.
These examples demonstrate that we need structuralized information to build and maintain "Data Lakes and its Data Pools" of the package of SED, DRR, and HA projects.
This approach sets the directions (vectors) of paths leading from generality to details, especially data, to a large amount of data that could move, disseminate, evaluate, and integrate using the Internet.
This international communication should transform human education and strengthen the individual behavior of the needed majority of the human population.
Digital transformation is impossible without these steps (in scaling processes) and detailed breaking and distinguishing what in the time structure means As-Is, To-Be, and a set of paths from a Vision to the Mission of goods and services in the GT.
Figure C5d.2. 3, 4 presents a model of the hierarchy of goals and offers ways to suggest the risks of solving them in a common framework of three triads. The model distinguishes three levels:
The Great Triad (GT) is a state of As-Is (as the Human, we all know our position in the Universe today: from pure religion to the findings of modern science).
Task Triad (TT) as a state of To-Be (what we must do so that we do not get lost in space too soon, the Ecosystem of our planet and Man with it did not suffer).
Project Triad (PT) as a state of Vision-Mission (what we do, what we need to improve, and what to start doing entirely differently). It presents a hierarchy of three triads that makes any observer's expansive surroundings (his/her immediate environment) less abstract and better to grasp.
However, this is not an academic trick. It is a way to balance religious (emotional) madness and a practical (intellectual) way of life.
I want to add; that if trust and solidarity between people are the main ways of dealing with accumulating problems, then, on the UN platform, such a healing process must occur. The text of this paragraph supplements the table below that distinguishes the items (objects) in question.
It sets the directions (vectors) of paths leading from generality to details, especially data, to a large amount of data that could move, disseminate, evaluate, and integrate using the Internet.
This international communication should transform human education. Digital transformation is not possible without these steps.