Figure C4c. Project and Organizations through SED, DRR, and HA projects

Figure C4c. Project and Organizations through SED, DRR, and HA projects
More informations

Project Paradigm

(general notes concerning T. S. Kuhn)

A paradigm (In Greek pattern, example, model) is a generally accepted scheme. It is a set of assumptions, concepts, values, rules, and practices shared by a particular community.

The term paradigm was first generally defined in "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by the American theorist and historian of science, Thomas Samuel Kuhn (1923-1996). He introduced the paradigm as a global organizational model or a theory with great luminosity for scientists' work. Applications of this approach enrich the current philosophy and penetrate other fields.

We can see, after all, the development of all disciplines, including science, and, with its inventions, the penetration of paradigms into the technique of public life and new technological applications.

There is another term similar to the term paradigm. It is "episteme," according to the French philosopher and sociologist Michel Foucault (1926–1984). Although his path is based on a different basis (discourse of individual epochs) and deals with the "archeology of knowledge," its benefit is that it places science in one of the factors created by the epistemic of each specific social period. Other philosophers of the present follow these works.

For example, the Czech philosopher and biologist Zdeněk Neubauer (1942–2016) said that the paradigm becomes a paradigm only if it descends from an abstract, theoretical level and sinks deep into the layers of our everyday experience. Only then does the paradigm become a holistic image that directs our perspective and foreshadows what we (only) see, find, and understand.

The SPC Concept builds on these findings. The author of this concept says that changes caused by science (human reason) and the effects of catastrophes (the phenomena that accompany life on Earth) are processes that the human population has learned and is still learning to record, capture and describe in a project. In this sense, the project is no longer just a tool but fills the space between science and practice as a paradigm.

The project can describe, react to these processes and apply (implement) many of them in practical life. In this sense, the project covers all elements of DM (Disciplinary Matrix). It fulfills the function of a paradigm, the role of synthesis (integrity) of data from the field of science, technology, and the technique of life.

This book presents the project as a paradigm of the most comprehensive human activity, represented by the SED, DRR, and HA projects, which have historical, present, and forthcoming values. It is an environment of an infinite number of project chains with the ability to generate structured data for the needs of public and private sector communities in a local, regional and global environment.

As-Is WBS

(Work Break-Down Structure)

A work breakdown structure (WBS) is a rational-oriented breakdown of a project into smaller components. Project Management (PM) and Systems Engineering (SE) are dominant users of this technique. It is a key project deliverable that organizes the team's work into manageable sections.

WBS in project management is a valuable method for completing a complex, multi-step project. Breaks-down any task into smaller chunks means jobs done simultaneously by different team members, leading to better project team productivity and easier project management.

Every project needs a WBS like they have their schedules (timing) and budgets (financing). A good WBS is essential for defining the scope of a project (see project triad: scope, time, costs).

The WBS is a core logic tool and a significant input for creating the project schedule, budget, and risk plan of all projects in the preparation and implementation stages.

To-Be WBS

(Work Break-Down Structure)

In the coming time of the digital transformation, the WBS method, which project engineers have mastered, is a logical link between their thinking and the structure of machine work.

In other words, when a machine completes a project design or prepares its implementation, the WBS method is a newly renovated tool for reading the result of the machine's work.

The WBS is not expecting a transformation but a proper revision of this technique. In other words. If WBS enters the digital transformation, it will have to fully respect the rules of new digitally structured databases with security features (e.g., blockchain and smart contract).

Further will have to respect the needs of complex digitized algorithms, which increasingly will demand machines and not people. (e.g., Chapter D presents the opportunities: Project Preparation Machines, PPM or Project Implementation Machines, PIM, etc.).

The picture also indicates the application of WBS skills even after the project's closing, when the work created by the project will offer products and services or get into a situation of bankruptcy or lockdown. WBS method will serve the ext-post audits apps.

Harmonizing "machine" messages with human pragmatic thinking will be necessary. The impacts of electronic applications will be growing, and the view on them will look fuzzier and fuzzier than be readable.

S&S

(Scales of Scaling)

Scalability is a system's desirable feature (ability) to work (e.g., in organizations or projects). It can react to sudden changes by performing tasks according to monitored parameters (effectiveness, economy, results), including extreme loads (in scale by set parameters).

Scalability measures distinguish scalability skills: administrative, functional, geographical, and load scalability. Data scale can have four levels: nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio. Each measurement has essential skills, and it is helpful to understand and distinguish their functions.

D&C

(Digital transformation and Computerization)

Digital Transformation is the phenomenon of 21. century. Digital technologies are transforming operations, products, and services in organizations large and small, and a new paradigm of projects is coming.

Computerization is starting to use a computer to do something that is the work of people or other machines before; it is slowly taking hold of every aspect of production, services, and results.

Digital transformation is a challenge related to practicality, efficiency, and economy.

SPP

(Super Package of SED, DRR, and HA projects)

Super Package of SED, DRR, and HA projects is a virtual model of standard project processes that we can identify in any spending of SED, DRR, and HA projects in any locality of a poor province anywhere around the world.

SPC Drivers and the spending principles predetermine the model of standard project processes. Their characteristics are defined by the performance of the SPC Utility of a province that operates in the SPC Concept business rules framework.

The SPP set of SED, DRR, and HA projects is about each project's quantity and quality character.

A project is a summary of partial tasks with the given content and process algorithm that must be prepared and implemented in a set structure of time stages (milestones) and the spectrum ad volume of funds allocated to each project.

In this light, the essential characteristics of the SED, DRR, and HA projects can be summarized as follows:

  • SED: the development of well-being and security of people in their settlements is born through plans with sufficient time reserved for their preparation and implementation.

    Plan failures are primarily the result of mistakes that people themselves bring to projects.

  • DRR: the development of well-being and safety of people (e.g., in their residences) is exposed to several risks.

    DRR projects are looking for the necessary measures and tools to eliminate them or set skills for their management.

    DRR projects aim to help solve ad hoc situations, prepare SED projects in time, and increase their quality.

  • HA: It is a quick aid that must react on the level of a critical ad-hoc situation and be ready to follow the project principle. The HA is fast action and records the disaster scope.

    It is about the structure and the potential of coming impacts). When funds are consumed, all spending should be archived according to the standard project methodology.

    The goal is to save people and their property, gain data, and, in time, liquidate any corruption experiments. The responsible bodies should do it when it is possible to convert data into a complete project.

    It will make it possible to transform the acquired data into the know-how of DRR and SED projects in the broader context.

Figure C4c is simple, but its contents are not easy to read. It contexts the relationship of current organizations (across the spectrum of standard organizational structures) to projects that organizations clash and complement.

Organizations need this relationship for growth, protection, and stability (in a market and democratic environment). The projects they need are an opportunity for them to grow and, at the same time, a task that they cannot handle so easily.

Especially if they are in one package called "SED, DRR, and HA." But the solution is simple. Organizations (enterprises and institutions) and projects (SED, DRR, and HA package) have principles, practices, and algorithms that complement each other via science and new technologies.

Organizations and projects complement each other; the sale (supply) and purchase (demand) of products, services, and works happen. The offer of organizations creates the diversity of the market and ensures its sustainability (viability).

The demand for projects stimulates the emergence of new projects and brings new opportunities to the market. Today's economy knows all this and can explain what is missing, e.g., the Algorithm Framework Theory (AFT), its development, and dissemination.

But it's not simple anymore. This chapter seeks to support ways to unite organizations and projects, not treat political distortions.

Figure C4d refers to the model of the everyday environment of organizations and projects in the data lake, with data in the highest hierarchy of (imaginary) data layers.

It is a choice of a sufficiently large abstraction that allows us to think about how organizations and projects communicate with each other.

The organization presents a square matrix of four functions (production, services, bankruptcy, lockdown) and three sizes (micro, small, and medium). Business displays in a matrix that resembles "viruses."

It has nothing to do with the COVID 19 pandemic, but the cross-cutting, global impact, and associated international and interdisciplinary responses may underline this parable.

The truth is that this representation of organizations was simply a work of logic when it was expedient to apply the principles offered to us by biology, which are technically solved by physics. The sensor is at the point of collision.

The matrix of the distribution system of elements (organizations) presents each sample (organization) as its needs in matters of research and sales (it has its business, its risks, and its field of competitiveness for its products, services, and works).

The distribution system in this layer exists within the framework of statistical probability theory, mathematical statistics, and other fields, which leak into new practice and new views on the structure and work with data and information.

Again, this chapter, together with the entire webbook, seeks to support the steps in preparing tests and practical applications of the digital transformation at the global level (concerning today's world disparities between high and low-income countries).

The principle of this path explains Figure C4d.