Figure C1c.2a The duty of the Human (figuratively), duty of UN

Figure C1c.2a The duty of the Human (figuratively), duty of UN
More informations

Figure C1c.2a The duty of the Human (figuratively), duty of UN

Yes, the role of the Human in the GT seems to be simple and, for many, clear. We are all people who have been, are, and will be glad to stay on Earth forever. Is there something wrong with such wishes? It's me, my family, all in the city, the countryside, the same country, the same continent, and Earth. 

But the climate changes and the COVID-19 pandemic prove that thinking "only me" is not enough for the present day. We can see the need for team creativity and collective cohesion. People need a different motivation and more comprehensive financing and capital-building structure for individual and collective survival. 

It is a challenge for everyone, including the 1-10% of the richest. Challenge advocates for the sustainability of the Human in the GT environment because the inputs for demands of the Human's needs and life processes are dramatically growing. 

It is also about more complex thinking on material consumption, not only about actual market prices but also limits at the time of scarcity (e.g., how to protect one's competitiveness and sustainability on the market). It is about needed and fluent financing flow, capital building, safety, and liability for the sustainability of the Human's existence in the GT.   

Figure C1c.2a reminds two critical tasks of the Human:

  • The first: is the tax duty of the Human to protect his/her sustainability in the GT.

  • The second is the need to take care of the worldwide structure of incentives for materials used in industry, services, and works (primarily civil) and enforce this task.

The reason is simple, but it is existential. The irreversible scars done by the Human on the Earth (in the atmosphere, in the seas, infertile soil) must be able to solve and finance with their money. In the same way, the damage caused by the Human to Nature. Similarly, the amount of a broad spectrum of waste that deforms and limits Nature must be thoroughly removed in the own interest of the Human. Also, in these cases, he/she must use one's own money (generally scattered in the structure of personal and state property today). 

The Human (humanity) must obtain the actual money for these tasks through a tax collection, a well-known and proven tool. What is new is the administration, management, and monitoring of the efficiency and effectiveness of consumption (utilization) of the gained funds and their financial security via principles of the capital reserves. But that's what this webbook is treating.  

The Great Triad (GT) is a natural integrator, regulator, and killer of different paths to philosophies, religions, and governing power of the Human. But humans are proud. Presents his/her participation as a one-way set of social rules of the Human focused on the Human despite being the partner of the Earth and Nature in the GT shared environment. The problem is not only in the one-way legal framework but also in the most critical risks linked to the financial techniques that stay in front of a crucial break of the new technologies entrance into projects and organizations in the global operations.  

In close cooperation with the Project Manager (PM), in the link to the works on the ICT project, both (the PM and PA) follow detailed plans, sections, views, constructions, and other drawings that enable the structure of the building and related technologies (in a split responsibility). It also covers entries and additions to drawings, documentation specifications, materials requirements, construction procedures, and construction and assembly technology. 

So PA fulfills his/her mission. Communicates with the local authority (e.g., organize construction supervision before, during, and after construction). Coordinates inputs from stakeholders and suppliers (e.g., supply chain failures). It maintains quality controls properly, primarily on-site during project implementation. 

He keeps a list of minor defects or omissions in connection with the administration of contracts he is responsible for and direct links to project managers in any matter of more enormous (significant) faults or threats. That all creates vital data feedback and generates the potential for future improvements. 

Jana explained this in the narrative in Figure C7b, "Father and daughter in time." In it, "... Jana was silent for a moment and said: “Dad, listen to this thought: Anthropologists observe and evaluate phases of human development over millions of years. Million years ago, our predecessors were Homo Habilis, then Homo Erectus, and about 100,000 years ago came Homo Sapiens. 

We are Homo Sapiens Sapiens. After 2050, there will be over 10 billion individual Homo Sapiens Sapiens. When we accept what the term ‘Sapiens’ means, i.e., “wise man,” then all of us might say: "Wow! So many wise people, and since we are Sapiens Sapiens, it might mean “wise to the second power, M2.” How will people and the whole of nature deal with that?” 

The model situation (HS, HD, HH, HP, and HT) is presented in an optimistic spirit to support the reader’s creativity and individual approach. The reader needs to distinguish between two views. One view belongs to the creators, all those who want to change the quality of life in their province, and the second belongs to all who wish to learn in a new environment to move, enjoy, work and do business. 

It’s similar to the mobile phone phenomenon. Someone has to invent, produce, and sell the phone so that a person who bought the phone gets an opportunity to learn to use it. Mobile phones with user infrastructure are very complicated for users but do not worry; all these complications are integrated and hidden inside the phone you have on hand, and you can use them.

The primary criteria are if this Human seeks a safe life and the paths to improve it or if his objective is to spread evil and hatred. Both are coming to mind. It is a relationship between HS (Homo Sapiens) and HD (Homo Diabolus). It isn't easy to find a way. 

Direct evidence probably will never be found. Indirect evidence: If we are not only looking for good and evil, we can accept the principle of relativity as an approach that will significantly increase our ability to better orient ourselves in the environment of good and evil.