Figure C9f.1 Structure of individual (solo) and orchestration (harmony) projects

Figure C9f.1 Structure of individual (solo) and orchestration (harmony) projects
More informations

Figure C9f.1 Structure of individual (solo) and orchestration (harmony) projects

Webbook introduces the project as the key to any human anabasis's success in the GT environment. Projects performances are split into two approaches.

The first is a soloist approach, and the second is focused on the services of a project orchestration unit (SPC Utility). Figure C9f.1 distinguishes the roles of potentials, processes, and results:

  • Potential for a project; (e.g., human, financial sources, or a supply chain capacity). Specifically saying it is the potential of the project actors.

  • Processes (strategy, tactic, operations) of a project; (e.g., the balance of all three views and actor's consensus on an agreement to prepare, implement and close a project). Specifically, processes are about work packages.

  • Result of a project; (e.g., a new organization, the wall against tsunami, building a supply chain, law act innovation). Specifically, results are announced via project milestones.

Project work packages and milestones are described in needed details (their sense and mechanisms) in the following Chapters (D, E, F).

But in any case, what and how to scale (e.g., standard methodology, language, and data definition for the segment of proposed services of a project orchestration unit, SPC Utility in the framework of the SPC Drivers) is introduced in the table of this Figure.

Each role in a project (potential, process, and results) has its code name (small letters, figures, and big letters).

Figure C9f.2 presents the same but with the concentration on the interface of such data concentration, emphasizing the core routine principle of any project: internal financial control.